SpeedPerformanceCore Web Vitals

Core Web Vitals Checklist: Speed Optimization in 2026

Google's Core Web Vitals are still a ranking factor in 2026. Here's what the AISeen Speed Score measures and how to diagnose the most common performance bottlenecks.

A
AISeen Team
··7 min read

Page speed has been a Google ranking signal since 2018. In 2026 it remains one of the few factors you can directly control and measure. This guide covers the metrics AISeen checks, what thresholds Google uses, and which optimizations deliver the most improvement per effort.

What AISeen Speed Score Measures

  • Time to First Byte (TTFB) — Server response time. Target: under 200 ms. Issues: slow hosting, no CDN, unoptimized database queries.
  • HTML size — Uncompressed document size. Large HTML often indicates server-side rendering issues or unneeded inline data.
  • HTTP version — HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 enable multiplexed requests, significantly reducing load time on connection-heavy pages.
  • Compression — Brotli or gzip compression should be enabled for all text assets. Uncompressed HTML/CSS/JS is one of the cheapest fixes.
  • Cache headers — Static assets should have long-lived Cache-Control headers. Missing cache headers force browsers to re-download assets on every visit.
  • Resource hints<link rel="preload">, preconnect, and prefetch directives reduce perceived load time by front-loading critical resources.

The Biggest Speed Killers

In our analysis of 50,000+ sites, three issues appear most frequently:

  1. Render-blocking scripts — JavaScript files loaded in <head> without defer or async block HTML parsing.
  2. Unoptimized images — PNG files where WebP or AVIF would reduce size by 30–70% with no visible quality loss.
  3. No CDN — Serving static assets from a single origin adds 100–500 ms of latency for global users.

Prioritizing Your Fixes

Not every fix is equal. Start with server-level changes (TTFB, compression, HTTP/2) because they affect every page simultaneously. Then move to image optimization and resource hints. JavaScript deferral often requires code changes and should be tackled last.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a good AISeen Speed Score?
A score of 80 or above indicates strong performance. 60–79 needs attention. Below 60 suggests significant user-experience impact and likely ranking penalties on mobile.
Does AISeen run Lighthouse?
AISeen's Speed Score measures server-level signals (TTFB, compression, cache headers) directly via HTTP inspection. It does not replicate Lighthouse's JavaScript-based rendering metrics — for LCP and CLS you should still run Lighthouse separately.

Check your site's scores now

SEO, GEO, Security, Speed & more — free audit in under 30 seconds.

Audit your site free →

Related articles